Monogamy

What makes a person monogamous? What will stop them from cheating? Why are some people more prone to cheating than others?

The safe guard, or insurance plan to many relationships is an invisible policy we call “Monogamy.” The monogamy insurance policy states that both people will be sexually exclusive to each other until “death do us part.” The importance of this invisible assurance is so strong, that each person builds their life around creating safety and security for each other, trusting the other is doing the same. From creating and raising of children, to building financial security, the belief is held in the monogamy insurance policy.

So what changes in a person, to make them “forget” about the “Monogamy Policy”?

If you have been betrayed, you can attest to the betrayal being the most hurtful. More than the act of sex itself, the betrayal or breaking the sacred trust in which the Monogamy Policy creates, is often more than most can tolerate. Hence why emotional affairs (non-sexual affairs) are just as painful in many cases, as sexual affairs for many people.)

If you have been unfaithful, you may feel deeply ashamed and yet surprised at your own actions. Perhaps thought you would not this type of person? Maybe your father cheated on your mother, and you said to yourself, “I’ve never cheat on my wife.” Perhaps you were deeply hurt a by cheating ex-girlfriend, or wife, and promised your current partner, “I could never cheat on a partner like they cheated on me,” and yet here you are – now the cheater.

So let’s move on to what can challenge commitment in a monogamous relationship?

Firstly we have to understand commitment issues have to be repaired on two levels:

1. Individual level
2. Relationship level

The Individual Level

On the individual level, we will find issues that require professional therapy and counseling. These issues cannot be dealt with in couple counseling. The individual had these issues before the relationship existed, and has not worked on these issues prior to getting into the relationship, for one reason or another.

Issues that will effect ones ability to commit to a monogamous relationship include:

• Personality disorders
• Addictions
• Sexual Orientation
• FOO/Belief 
• Values
• Attachment Style
• Adoption

The Relationship Level

On the relationship level, we explain how monogamy is maintained by looking at the IRI monogamy pyramid.

• Intimacy
• Beliefs
• Friendships
• Attachment Style

How We Really Choose Our Mates

When two people fall in love, something profound is happening that goes far beyond physical attraction, desire for companionship and even similarity of values and interests. There is an activation of an unconscious agenda that began years ago, rooted in childhood hurts and unmet needs. That agenda stated simply is this: We are all unconsciously looking for a particular someone who will help us finish childhood, heal childhood wounds and regain wholeness. We believe this is Nature’s plan for emotional healing.

There seems to be built into the natural order that nature consistently tries to heal itself. When there is a forest fire, nature immediately begins healing the scar and replenishing the forest. When there is an oil spill, nature begins a process that will eventually clean up the spill, though it may take 50 or more years. And where there are emotional wounds, nature also begins a process of healing.

Just as surely as when you scratch your arm and a scab forms, infection is fought and new skin is created, so where there are emotional wounds in childhood (damaged egos, fears of rejection or abandonment, fears of being smothered or controlled, doubts about competency, neglect etc.), there is set in motion an unrelenting drive for healing. But since emotional wounds are invariably relationship wounds, emotional wounds can only be healed in relationship–and in a particular kind of relationship.

To accomplish this agenda of healing, we have to be connected to someone similar to the wounding parents

We seem to be created so that the human psyche will only accept emotional healing from someone similar to the one who does the wounding. There is in all of us an innate striving for wholeness and completion that requires the selection of a mate that has the greatest potential for the healing of any childhood wounds and the fulfilling of any unmet childhood needs. To accomplish this, each person needs to be connected with someone who activates one’s needs at the deepest level and who is similar enough to the wounding parents to make healing possible.

But no one in their right mind would ever choose someone that had similar negative traits of their wounding parents. Who would consciously look for a life partner who is depressed, unavailable, distant and critical? It’s as though Nature had to find a way to get us connected and bonded to a person who would eventually be painfully incompatible in very specific areas. As a solution, Nature created romantic love. Romantic love puts us temporarily on drugs, suppresses our awareness of the negative traits of our partner (love really is blind) and creates a great expectation of the fulfilling of unmet needs and the healing of old wounds. We remain in this state until we are bonded and hopefully married or committed.

Romantic Love is the way we get connected with someone who will eventually be incompatible in very specific and significant ways…because that is the kind of person we need for healing.

Then after the wedding (or just being together for a time), the drugs wear off, the bandages are ripped from our eyes and we see our partners as they really are, depressed, critical, not available, unreliable, neglectful–remarkably similar to negative traits in our parents. This is where most people bail out. They mistakenly conclude that they have made a major selection error, failing to see that this is indeed part of a natural plan for emotional healing. Almost half of all married couples get a divorce somewhere in this power struggle phase. And singles decide they have made a bad choice and move on to another relationship where the cycle begins again. These are indeed tragic and for the most part unnecessary choices.

There appears to be another factor in the selection process that makes this plan of nature even more remarkable. Not only are we connected with someone who could be the most powerful healer for us, we are also put with someone who will require us to grow in areas we are deficient in so that we can be a healer for them. What one partner needs the most for healing, the other is least able to give–until a part of the self that was repressed is activated and character defenses are softened.

Childhood lessons we learned from our caregivers:

• If we learned to protect ourselves as children by suppressing the emotional side of our self-functions, we will be put with someone who will require that we share our feelings at a significant level for their own healing.

• If we learned to be diffuse and emotional, we will be put with someone who will implore us to become more rational or thoughtful.

• If we found it was dangerous to reach out for contact or emotional closeness and became quiet and distant, we will be attracted to someone who will need us to reach out for emotional closeness in order for them to be healed, someone who will beg and demand us to initiate contact.

• If we learned as a child to be overly clinging or needy, we will be attracted to someone who will ask us to give them space, respect their separateness and enjoy their freedom.

SOURCE: Gary Brainerd